[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/7] iosched: introduce deadline_kick_page()

    On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:27:32PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
    > > The overhead of deadline_kick_page() becomes large when the request is
    > > large (256 pages). But I guess there's way to optimize it:
    > > - most requests will be consisted of a set of continuous pages, i.e. a
    > > range comparison will be sufficient.
    > > - for a system with lots of queued requests(>100), maybe the gain can
    > > well pay for the overheads?
    > Sorry, there's just no way that something like that is acceptable for
    > inclusion. I don't care much about the overhead numbers (I can see from
    > the code that it sucks :-), I wanted to see some numbers on what
    > scenarios this helps performance and by how much.

    Ok, thanks. I hope that I'll be able to bring with some performance
    numbers the next time :-)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-04 03:34    [W:0.021 / U:16.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site