Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 2 Jul 2006 23:08:03 -0700 | From | "Miles Lane" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.17-mm4 + hostap + pcmcia + lockdep -- possible recursive locking detected -- (af_callback_keys + sk->sk_family#3){-.-?}, at: [<c119d8db>] sock_def_readable+0x15/0x69 |
| |
On 7/2/06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > * Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I have patches for hostap, pcmcia and lockdep applied to this kernel. > > > These patches are the ones resulting from several recent message > > > threads. I just noticed this in my kernel log: > > > > > > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] > > > --------------------------------------------- > > > > ok, lockdep should allow same-class read-lock recursion too, because > > it's used by real code and is being relied upon. Could you try the patch > > below? [...] > > the patches are also included in the latest -mm5 combo patch at: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/lockdep-patches/lockdep-combo-2.6.17-mm5.patch
I have not seen this particular INFO message show up again. Therefore, I haven't tested your latest patch yet. I wanted to determine whether this problem would occur often. If you like I can go ahead and test the patch anyhow. I am currently testing mm5 + the pcmcia patch and the hostap patch. I am looking into a crashing (system lockup) bug that is triggered by removing my Linksys USB 10/100 Ethernet adapter. This problem is 100% repeatable. I am working on setting up a remote debugging configuration.
Would you like me to go ahead and test your latest patch?
Thanks, Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |