Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:47:51 -0600 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion |
| |
andrea@cpushare.com wrote:
> > >As far as I'm concerned the thing I like less of reiser4 is the plugin >thing, I'd be less concerned if that was a microkernel (fuse-like) >userland plugin system. >
Performance. If your plugin is performance valuing, it needs to be in kernel. Also, FUSE does not have per-file plugins (correct me if I err here). It would be nice to see it pay attention to reiser4 pluginids, and thus become per-file.
Thanks for your other words, which I will not comment on because I agree with them.;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |