[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] #define rwxr_xr_x 0755
    On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:34:11AM -0700, Handle X wrote:
    > On 7/27/06, Björn Steinbrink <> wrote:
    > >On 2006.07.28 00:59:11 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
    > >> Every time I try to decipher S_I* combos I cry in pain. Often I just
    > >> refer to include/linux/stat.h defines to find out what mode it is
    > >> because numbers are actually quickier to understand.
    > >>
    > >> Compare and contrast:
    > >>
    > >> 0644 vs S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR vs rw_r__r__
    > >>
    > >> I'd say #2 really sucks.
    > >
    > >IMHO #3 sucks more, it's not as easy to spot when glossing over the
    > >code, the underscores make it quite ugly (think _r________) and it's
    > >less "greppable". If I know that there's something that sets S_ISUID, I
    > >can easily search for that, compare that to [_cpdbl]{1}[r_]{1}[w_]{1}s...
    > I agree with Steinbink. But how about having macros like,
    > S_I0700, S_I0070, S_I6444 ..etc. They combine visual appeal of octals,
    > easy to grep, easy to decipher ...etc.

    Even better!

    Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

    In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
    when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
    - Linus Torvalds
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-28 18:51    [W:0.020 / U:12.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site