Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:10:56 +0300 | From | "Shem Multinymous" <> | Subject | Re: Generic battery interface |
| |
On 7/28/06, Brown, Len <len.brown@intel.com> wrote: > I'm not religious about /dev vs. /sys.
I would greatly prefer a sysfs interface. Having a clean, textual sysfs API that's easily accessed from shell has been extremely conductive for the development of the tp_smapi driver -- users can easily test and script the driver without extra programming and userspace components. Since tp_smapi is (AFAIK) the most feature-rich battery driver we now have, this is some to consider.
(If you're not convinced yet, let me say one word: udev.)
Shem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |