Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:17:00 +0200 | From | andrea@cpushare ... | Subject | Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion |
| |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:37:57PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > This is where we disagree. It may be wrong, but it's certainly not > nearly *as* wrong....
;)
My point of view in saying you can't dismiss the current KLive stats completely, is simply that I didn't expect reiser4 numbers to be so high even in the small sample of the brave KLive project that is full of people willing to test new stuff (also note that I compared it to isofs, I didn't attempt a comparison with ext3 myself). That makes it a positive in my view.
If you think KLive numbers aren't a positive point for reiser4, then it can only mean you expected them to be even higher than they were... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |