![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:12:28PM -0500, Paul Fulghum wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:41:44AM -0500, Paul Fulghum wrote: > > > >>Chuck Ebbert wrote: > >> > >>>The cleaner fix looks more intrusive, though. > >>> > >>>Is this simpler change (what I'm running but without the warning > >>>messages) the preferred fix for -stable? > >> > >>It fixes the problem. > > > > > > So do you feel this patch should be added to the -stable kernel tree? > > No. Now that I think about it, adding that extra > macro is just wrong even if temporary. > > The real fix is equally simple, but in 2.6.18-rc > it is intertwined with other more intrusive changes. > > Let me make a new separate patch that does things > the right way, which is simply removing the list > head while processing the list so two instances > to not trip over each other. I would have done so > earlier, but I've been insanely busy with multiple > work related deadlines (lame excuse I know). > > I should post something tomorrow afternoon. Ok, we can wait, I'd rather have the proper fix instead of the band-aid. Just send it to stable@kernel.org when you have something that you feel comfortable with. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-26 09:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||