lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
From
Date
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:27:14 +0300, Al Boldi said:
> Peter Williams wrote:

> > It's probably not a good idea to have different schedulers managing the
> > same resource. The way to do different scheduling per process is to use
> > the scheduling policy mechanism i.e. SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR, etc.
> > (possibly extended) within each scheduler. On the other hand, on an SMP
> > system, having a different scheduler on each run queue (or sub set of
> > queues) might be interesting :-).
>
> What's wrong with multiple run-queues on UP?

On an SMP system, you can have one CPU doing one class of scheduling (long
timeslice for computational, for example), while another CPU is dedicated
to doing RT scheduling, and so on. It's not clear to me that "different
classes per CPU" makes any real sense on a UP....[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-25 21:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site