[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] Add force of use MMCONFIG [try #1]

    On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Why do we want to do this? Are the ACPI-provided tables incorrect? If so,
    > what problems are caused by this?

    The ACPI-provided tables are apparently correct, but we sanity-check them
    by _also_ requiring that the mmconfig base address is marked "reserved" in
    the e820 tables.

    The EFI memory maps apparently don't do that "reserved" marking.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.020 / U:2.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site