lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 24 Jul 2006 09:15:46 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs
* Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> wrote:

> touch_nmi_watchdog() calls touch_softlockup_watchdog() on both 
> architectures that implement it (i386 and x86_64). On other 
> architectures it does nothing at all. touch_nmi_watchdog() should 
> imply touch_softlockup_watchdog() on all architectures. Suggested by 
> Andi Kleen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

although i suspect this could be cleaned up by consolidating both under 
touch_watchdog(), right?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-24 07:27    [W:6.437 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans