![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> wrote: > touch_nmi_watchdog() calls touch_softlockup_watchdog() on both > architectures that implement it (i386 and x86_64). On other > architectures it does nothing at all. touch_nmi_watchdog() should > imply touch_softlockup_watchdog() on all architectures. Suggested by > Andi Kleen. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> although i suspect this could be cleaned up by consolidating both under touch_watchdog(), right? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-24 07:27 [W:6.437 / U:0.000 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||