![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Citerar Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>:
> ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrot>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/stddef.h b/include/linux/stddef.h
> > index b3a2cad..498813b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/stddef.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/stddef.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ #else
> > #define NULL ((void *)0)
> > #endif
> >
> > +#define false ((0))
> > +#define true ((1))
>
> I would say:
>
> #undef true
> #undef false
Sorry about the delay but why the undef's? Found no problem to remove those and
think a warning would be good if a #define of false/true would show up
(otherwise, why have them there in the first place?).
> enum {
> false = 0,
> true = 1
> };
>
> #define false false
> #define true true
/Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-23 21:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||