lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 2)
    Citerar Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>:

    > ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrot>

    > > diff --git a/include/linux/stddef.h b/include/linux/stddef.h
    > > index b3a2cad..498813b 100644
    > > --- a/include/linux/stddef.h
    > > +++ b/include/linux/stddef.h
    > > @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ #else
    > > #define NULL ((void *)0)
    > > #endif
    > >
    > > +#define false ((0))
    > > +#define true ((1))
    >
    > I would say:
    >
    > #undef true
    > #undef false

    Sorry about the delay but why the undef's? Found no problem to remove those and
    think a warning would be good if a #define of false/true would show up
    (otherwise, why have them there in the first place?).

    > enum {
    > false = 0,
    > true = 1
    > };
    >
    > #define false false
    > #define true true

    /Richard Knutsson

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-23 21:59    [W:4.279 / U:0.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site