Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:56:36 +0200 | From | ricknu-0@student ... | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 2) |
| |
Citerar Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>:
> ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrot>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/stddef.h b/include/linux/stddef.h > > index b3a2cad..498813b 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/stddef.h > > +++ b/include/linux/stddef.h > > @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ #else > > #define NULL ((void *)0) > > #endif > > > > +#define false ((0)) > > +#define true ((1)) > > I would say: > > #undef true > #undef false
Sorry about the delay but why the undef's? Found no problem to remove those and think a warning would be good if a #define of false/true would show up (otherwise, why have them there in the first place?).
> enum { > false = 0, > true = 1 > }; > > #define false false > #define true true
/Richard Knutsson
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |