Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:35:11 +0200 (CEST) | From | Tomasz Kłoczko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc. |
| |
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Stefan Richter wrote: [..] > Style issues like "sizeof(struct foo)" versus "sizeof(*bar)" in memory > allocation are beyond what indent can and should do. > >> Coding style seems is Linux case kind of never ending story. > > It's not a big deal in my limited experience, as far as there is a documented > consensus. > >> Keep one/common coding style in this case is someting not for small tool >> but more for .. Superman/Hecules (?) > [...] > > Yes. Or subsystem maintainers who didn't already could adopt the documented > style. Or correct the document where it doesn't reflect consensus.
Moment .. are you want to say something like "keep commont coding style can't be maintained by tool" ? Even if indent watches on to small coding style emenets still I don't see why using this tool isn't one of the current ement of release procedure (?).
kloczek -- ----------------------------------------------------------- *Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają* ----------------------------------------------------------- Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl* | |