![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:01:15 +0200, Diego Calleja wrote: > Maybe it's too late and reiser 4 will get in in the next release, but > I've written this doc into the kernelnewbies' wiki: > http://wiki.kernelnewbies.org/WhyReiser4IsNotIn . If you disagree with > something in that doc, edit it or just answer to this mail what you want > to see in it and I'll add it myself. It could be improved in two ways in order to better convince people: Firstly, mention some (perhaps even all) of the actual technical issues preventing the inclusion of Reiser4. Right now, you are giving much space to the political issues (or their non-existence). This answers a different question ("Why we are fed up with the Reiser4 discussion") than the one in the title, and in the worst case might leave a reader with the impression that political reasons are more important after all. Secondly, the questions in the FAQ part should probably be put in a less loaded form. For example, Q1 could just read objectively: "Why can't Reiser4 be included as an experimental feature?" As it stands now, I fear too many people's reaction upon reading it will be: "That's not my question." At least leave off the plaintive initial "but" on Q1 and Q2. It puts off the readers you want to convince. HTH Tilman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-20 06:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||