Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:52:31 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 19:50 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > >> Does this mean that you don't want to see these fno-stack-protector > > >> patches go into Andrew's tree? > > > > > > long term.. no. Because I want to enable stack-protector for the kernel > > > (I have patches for that; all it needs is a 5 line gcc patch to make it > > > work) as debug option at least (and if the perf impact isn't too bad, > > > distros and security sensitive people can enable it always). > > > > > > > Obviously, but at that time we should enable -fno-stack-protector vs > > -fno-stack-protector doesn't even exist afaics;
ok it does; I just tested on the wrong machine sorry
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |