lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
From
Date
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 19:50 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >
> > >> Does this mean that you don't want to see these fno-stack-protector
> > >> patches go into Andrew's tree?
> > >
> > > long term.. no. Because I want to enable stack-protector for the kernel
> > > (I have patches for that; all it needs is a 5 line gcc patch to make it
> > > work) as debug option at least (and if the perf impact isn't too bad,
> > > distros and security sensitive people can enable it always).
> > >
> >
> > Obviously, but at that time we should enable -fno-stack-protector vs
>
> -fno-stack-protector doesn't even exist afaics;

ok it does; I just tested on the wrong machine
sorry


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-02 19:54    [W:0.042 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site