![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
ricknu-0@student.ltu.se wrote: > Citerar Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>: >> Please, show compiler flag[s] to enable warning[s] from gcc about >> >> _Bool foo = 42; >> >> Until you do that the whole activity is moot. > On it... Would not the compiler treat 42 as a Boolean expression (as opposed to an integer expression) that evaluates to true and set foo accordingly. I.e. there's only a problem here if foo ends up with the value 42 instead of the value true. Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-20 01:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||