![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi James, > > so I used your exploit and I could reproduce it on every 2.6 kernel, I > > tried so far. > > That must have been a lot of fscks. it wasn't that many. For some obvious reasons I only tested the RHEL and Fedora kernels and vanilla plus stable series. > > However with a 2.4 kernel I see the error messages, but it > > doesn't get remounted read-only. Did you run tests with 2.4 kernels? > > no, I don't have any to hand, but someone is preparing one > now. Is NFS subtree checking on by default in 2.4? I haven't checked within the code, but the manual page exports(5) states subtree checking as being on by default. And it doesn't mention any difference to 2.4 kernels. What is the reason behind your question? Does disabling subtree checking changes something? Regards Marcel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-18 17:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||