Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:38:34 +0200 | From | "Alex Riesen" <> | Subject | Re: Reiser4 Inclusion |
| |
On 7/17/06, Caleb Gray <caleb@calebgray.com> wrote: > Reiser4's responsiveness is undoubtedly at least twice as fast as ext3. > I have deployed two nearly identical servers in Florida (I live in > Washington state) but one difference: one uses ext3 and the other > reiser4. The ping time of the reiser4 server is (on average) 20ms faster > than the ext3 server.
While it is possible (by reiser4 loading the system less) that filesystem affects network subsystem, it is highly unlikely and usually a sign of problems elsewhere.
> It has maintained this speed for the past two > years against the ext3 server even with aging hardware and bulking file > and directory structures. (Both of the filesystems have slowed down at a > similar pace for the duration of their lifetime [about 15ms].)
especially so if the difference lies in 5 ms range. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |