Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:50:38 +0200 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: reiserFS? |
| |
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, ivo welch wrote:
> dear linux geeks: may I ask why the "new" (many years old) reiser > filesystem is not making it into the kernel? it does seem to have > some advantages, if nothing else at least over the old reiser v3.
Why would anyone want ReiserFS in the kernel that is discontinued by its developers when it's just started to become stabile and useful, with bugs (hashing) remaining, as happened with 3.6? Who is going to make guarantees this won't happen again with reiser4?
Besides that, there had been technical discrepancies that prevented reiser4 inclusion into the baseline kernel when it was suggested, search the archives for details.
There's ext3, you can set the dir_index option (either for mke2fs, or afterwards with tune2fs, then unmount and run e2fsck -fD) and you're set.
-- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |