![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:06:45 +1000
> - __ret; \
> + unlikely(__ret); \
Wouldn't it be cleaner to wrap this unlikely around
the top-level "({ })"? When it sits on a line by
itself it looks strange, that much is true :)
Actually, the last time I saw a construct like this
it was a bug, someone was doing:
return unlikely(someval);
which turned someval into a boolean, even though what
was intended was that the full value was returned.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-15 07:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||