![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between > 2.6.17.4 and 2.6.17.5, as it is small enough to do so. I did a slight modification of the patch I committed initially, in the face of the report from Marcel that the initial sledge-hammer approach broke his hald setup. See commit 9ee8ab9fbf21e6b87ad227cd46c0a4be41ab749b: "Relax /proc fix a bit", which should still fix the bug (can somebody verify? I'm 100% sure, but still..), but is pretty much guaranteed to not have any secondary side effects. It still leaves the whole issue of whether /proc should honor chmod AT ALL open, and I'd love to close that one, but from a "minimal fix" standpoint, I think it's a reasonable (and simple) patch. Marcel, can you check current git? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-15 07:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||