[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 2.6.18-rc1] genirq: {en,dis}able_irq_wake() need refcounting too
    On Monday 10 July 2006 1:58 am, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > * David Brownell <> wrote:
    > > It's not just "normal" mode operation that needs refcounting for the
    > > {en,dis}able_irq() calls ... "wakeup" mode calls need it too, for the
    > > very same reasons.
    > >
    > > This patch adds that refcounting. I expect that some ARM drivers will
    > > be triggering the new warning, but this call isn't yet widely used.
    > > (Which is probably why the bug has lingered this long...)
    > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <>
    > we should also add disable_irq_wake() / enable_irq_wake() APIs and start
    > migrating most ARM users over to the new APIs, agreed? That makes the
    > APIs more symmetric and the code more readable too.

    To recap, the driver code _is_ that symmetric, it's just the implementation
    that's asymmetric. That is, {en,dis}able_irq() are two separate routines,
    while {en,dis}able_irq_wake() are just wrap set_irq_wake().

    I'll forward this patch to the the ARM kernel list, to help avoid surprises.
    There aren't many in-tree drivers using these calls.

    - Dave

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-15 03:35    [W:0.021 / U:52.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site