[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm 5/7] add user namespace
    Dave Hansen <> writes:

    > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 13:02 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    >> All comparisons of a user equality need to be of the tuple (user namespace,
    > user id).
    >> Any comparison that does not do that is an optimization.
    > ...
    >> So my impression was that Cedric's patchset was overoptimized because
    >> it did not change most of the uid comparisons, to (user namespace, user id).
    > I might just be tempted to call them bugs so people understand what I'm
    > talking about ;)
    >> Because you can have access to files created in another user namespace it
    >> is very unlikely that optimization will apply very frequently. The easy
    > scenario
    >> to get access to a file descriptor from another context is to consider unix
    >> domain sockets.
    > OK, so you're saying that the lack of checks will cause problems rarely,
    > and that passing a fd across a unix domain sockets is one of the times
    > when you _could_ encounter this problem?

    I think for filesystems like /proc and /sys that there will normally
    be problems. However many of those problems can be rationalized away
    as a reasonable optimization, or are not immediately apparent.

    Passing a file descriptor between process in a unix domain socket is
    a case where I can easily construct scenarios where there are
    indisputable problems. It is one of my standard thought experiments
    to see if a namespace is sound.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-14 05:49    [W:0.024 / U:18.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site