lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
    Date
    Hi.

    On Wednesday 12 July 2006 20:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > We're doing something like you are, but I think we're using some other
    > option in LZF, because the resulting image size is 30-40% of the
    > uncompressed one. That's better for encryption later on, but obviously not
    > for speed.

    Maybe it's just that the caches compress better? 50% is common, but lower
    values are sometimes seen.

    Regards,

    Nigel
    --
    Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham
    5 Mitchell Street
    Cobden 3266
    Victoria, Australia
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-07-12 12:21    [W:4.170 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site