lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm 5/7] add user namespace
Date
Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com> writes:

> This patch adds the user namespace.
>
> Basically, it allows a process to unshare its user_struct table,
> resetting at the same time its own user_struct and all the associated
> accounting.
>
> For the moment, the root_user is added to the new user namespace when
> it is cloned. An alternative behavior would be to let the system
> allocate a new user_struct(0) in each new user namespace. However,
> these 0 users would not have the privileges of the root_user and it
> would be necessary to work on the process capabilities to give them
> some permissions.

It is completely the wrong thing for a the root_user to span multiple
namespaces as you describe. It is important for uid 0 in other namespaces
to not have the privileges of the root_user. That is half the point.

Too many files in sysfs and proc don't require caps but instead simply
limit things to uid 0. Having a separate uid 0 in the different namespaces
instantly makes all of these files inaccessible, and keeps processes from
doing something bad.

To a filesystem a uid does not share a uid namespace with the only things
that should be accessible are those things that are readable/writeable
by everyone. Unless the filesystem has provisions for storing multiple
uid namespaces not files should be able to be created. Think NFS root
squash.

> Signed-off-by: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
> Cc: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
> Cc: Andrey Savochkin <saw@sw.ru>
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Cc: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
> Cc: Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@catalyst.net.nz>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> fs/ioprio.c | 5 +
> include/linux/init_task.h | 2
> include/linux/nsproxy.h | 2
> include/linux/sched.h | 6 +-
> include/linux/user.h | 45 +++++++++++++++
> init/Kconfig | 8 ++
> kernel/nsproxy.c | 15 ++++-
> kernel/sys.c | 8 +-
> kernel/user.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----

This patch looks extremly incomplete.

Every comparison of a user id needs to compare the tuple
(user namespace, user id) or it needs to compare struct users.

Ever comparison of a group id needs to compare the tuple
(user namespace, group id) or it needs to compare struct users.

I think the key infrastructure needs to be looked at here as well.

There needs to be a user namespace association for mounted filesystems.

We need a discussion about how we handle map users from one user
namespace to another, because without some form of mapping so many
things become inaccessible that the system is almost useless.

I believe some of the key infrastructure which is roughly kerberos
authentication tokens could be used for this purpose.

A user namespace is a big thing. What I see here doesn't even
seem to scratch the surface.

Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-12 05:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site