Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:36:47 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [patch] Re: Magic Alt-SysRq change in 2.6.18-rc1 |
| |
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 02:52:24 +0200 (CEST) Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > IOW, someone needs to find a way to make the new code work like the old > > code without re-breaking Pavel's keyboard. But the bitchin-to-patchin > > ratio here seems to exclude that outcome. > > Traditionally that responsibility is in the hands of whose who break it in > the first place
If that person cannot reproduce the problem but another skilled kernel developer can then it would make sense for he-who-can-reproduce-it to do some work.
Still, I doubt if that's the case here.
Is the below correct?
Old behaviour:
a) press alt b) press sysrq c) release alt d) press T e) release T f) release sysrq
New behaviour:
a) press alt b) press sysrq c) release sysrq d) press T e) release T f) release alt
If so, then the old behaviour was weird and the new behaviour is sensible. What, actually, is the problem?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |