[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm 0/7] execns syscall and user namespace
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> How's that ?
> int execvef(int flags, const char *filename, char *const argv [], char
> *const envp[]);
> initially, flags would be :
> #define EXECVEF_NEWNS 0x00000100
> #define EXECVEF_NEWIPC 0x00000200
> #define EXECVEF_NEWUTS 0x00000400
> #define EXECVEF_NEWUSER 0x00000800
> execvef() would behave like execve() if flags == 0 and would return EINVAL
> if flags is invalid. unshare of a namespace can fail and usually returns

To be more specific, I guess, what I'm proposing is:

int execxveat(int flags, int dirfd, const char *filename,
char * const *argv, char * const *envp);

... with the -x- for the flags field; that can be dropped since it's
already established that -at() variants can take additional flags.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-12 02:31    [W:0.131 / U:2.648 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site