[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
 On Tue, Jul 11, Olaf Hering wrote:

> My point is:

Of course thats not the only one.
If nothing changes in userspace, it still has to be build with every new
kernel no matter how many other kernel changes were just added.
I remember it took some time to build klibc-0.123.
And if klibc really depends on kernel headers, and I do git-bisect on a
slower box, thats a waste of time. That really asks for an external
binary. Or CONFIG_KLIBC=n, if thats not convincing.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-11 22:25    [W:0.117 / U:1.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site