lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 2.6.18-rc1] genirq: {en,dis}able_irq_wake() need refcounting too
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:58:49AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > It's not just "normal" mode operation that needs refcounting for the
> > {en,dis}able_irq() calls ... "wakeup" mode calls need it too, for the
> > very same reasons.
> >
> > This patch adds that refcounting. I expect that some ARM drivers will
> > be triggering the new warning, but this call isn't yet widely used.
> > (Which is probably why the bug has lingered this long...)
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> we should also add disable_irq_wake() / enable_irq_wake() APIs and start
> migrating most ARM users over to the new APIs, agreed? That makes the
> APIs more symmetric and the code more readable too.

That _is_ the API anyway. set_irq_wake() was never intended to be called
directly from drivers.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-07-10 11:17    [W:0.062 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site