Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:04:32 +0200 | From | Haavard Skinnemoen <> | Subject | Re: AVR32 architecture patch against Linux 2.6.18-rc1 available |
| |
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:37:58 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:03:25 +0200 > Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> wrote: > > > I've put up an updated patch at > > http://avr32linux.org/twiki/pub/Main/LinuxPatches/avr32-arch-3.patch > > That diff doesn't update ./MAINTAINERS
Crap, I can't belive I left that out two times in a row...
> Please prepare a nice changelog describing the architecture (what's an > avr?), who supports it, useful web pages, how to build cross-tools, > etc. The sort of things which Linus and kernel developers should know > when someone sends in a half-megabyte patch. > > And a signed-off-by:, as per section 11 of > Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Updated patch with MAINTAINERS, a much longer changelog entry and Signed-off-by:
http://avr32linux.org/twiki/pub/Main/LinuxPatches/avr32-arch-4.patch
By the way, there's a separate patch #ifdef'ing out /dev/port available from the same LinuxPatches page. Should I fold it into the avr32-arch patch? I don't consider this a permanent solution anyway, so I made it a separate patch in order to drop it more easily when we actually implement port-based I/O...
Thanks, Håvard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |