[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/14] Per zone counter functionality
On Friday 09 June 2006 06:00, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
> Christoph Lameter <> wrote:
> > Per zone counter infrastructure
> >
> Is the use of 8-bit accumulators more efficient than using 32-bit ones?
> Obviously it's better from a cache POV, given that we have a pretty large
> array of them. But is there a downside on some architectures in not using
> the natural wordsize?

Maybe on very old alphas which didn't have 8 bit stores. They need a RMW cycle.

Other than that i wouldn't expect any problems. RISCs will just do the usual
32bit add in registers, but do a 8bit load/store.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-09 06:41    [W:0.138 / U:3.084 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site