[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

    On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
    > Jeff's approach taken to the rediculous would mean that we'd have
    > ext versions 1-40 by now at least. I don't think that helps much,
    > either.

    On the other hand, I _guarantee_ you that it helps that we have ext2-3,
    and not just ext2 (nobody even tried to keep ext1 compatible, thank the

    If for no other reason, than the fact that the ext3 development could be
    much more aggressive early on. Exactly because it did NOT screw up the old
    filesystem that everybody else depended on.

    So we have empirical evidence that splitting filesystem work up does
    actually help.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.028 / U:29.904 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site