lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: genirq: fasteoi change for retrigger
From
Date
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 10:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo, Thomas.
> >
> > Would you be ok with a small change to the fasteoi handler that
> >
> > - If the interrupt happens while disabled, rather than just doing goto
> > out, also mark it pending
> > - In the normal handling code path, clear pending.
> >
> > That would allow some sort of soft-disable to work with fasteoi.
> >
> > My issue here is on Cell. I have a very strange interrupt controller
> > that can't mask interrupts.
>
> sure, it looks reasonable to me. Thomas?

No objections.

tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-07 14:07    [W:1.057 / U:0.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site