Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: genirq: fasteoi change for retrigger | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:40:06 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 10:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > > Hi Ingo, Thomas. > > > > Would you be ok with a small change to the fasteoi handler that > > > > - If the interrupt happens while disabled, rather than just doing goto > > out, also mark it pending > > - In the normal handling code path, clear pending. > > > > That would allow some sort of soft-disable to work with fasteoi. > > > > My issue here is on Cell. I have a very strange interrupt controller > > that can't mask interrupts. > > sure, it looks reasonable to me. Thomas?
No objections.
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |