![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > there hasnt been any real problem since the MSI one. The core bits are > > rather stable. The patch-queue had positive input from the maintainers > > of the two architectures with the most complex IRQ hardware (arm and > > ppc*), and that's reassuring. But in any case, other architectures are > > not affected at all (sans brow paperbag build bugs and typos), their > > __do_IRQ() handling remains unchanged. So i'd like to see this in > > 2.6.18. (there a good deal of stuff we have ontop of genirq) > > There was a problem reported by Kevin Hillman , the -v5 version was > not functional on ARM omap boards .. Was that handled already in -v6? Daniel - you should be aware that the -mm genirq lineup does _not_ include the ARM bits. Those changes go via the normal ARM QA and merge path, i.e. via rmk. The -mm lineup only includes the generic bits (for type-based platforms). In any case, they dont impact upstream genirq merging plans. (The omap thing in the armirq queue is likely some small thing. Thomas is checking it.) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-07 10:46 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||