[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Fastboot] [RFC][PATCH] Add missing notifier before crashing
Vivek Goyal wrote:

>I think if we decide to implement something which allows other policies
>to co-exist with crash_kexec() then it should be more generic then a
>single function pointer.
A single function pointer function is suggested because it is the
simpliest compromise
I can thing of which should be able to satisfy all.

The simpliest policy I can think of is
-flip a bit on _dedicated_ hardware (crash notifier)
-launch capture kernel (existing kexec)

Nothing prevents you from implementing multiple policies to be
executed/selected among from
whatever is called by the single pointer function.

My key point is:
The complexity in my suggestion is a low as it can get, thus reliability of
kexec (hopefully) is unaffected
If crash notifiers is implemented by a complex "management system", I
might loose
reliability of kexec because of something I basically do not need.

Or to put it in other words, I you need to implement anything complex
for managing your policies,
you should add it yourself and you yourself is the only one being
affected by increased complexibility.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-06 12:14    [W:0.063 / U:38.744 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site