[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Fastboot] [RFC][PATCH] Add missing notifier before crashing
    Vivek Goyal wrote:

    >I think if we decide to implement something which allows other policies
    >to co-exist with crash_kexec() then it should be more generic then a
    >single function pointer.
    A single function pointer function is suggested because it is the
    simpliest compromise
    I can thing of which should be able to satisfy all.

    The simpliest policy I can think of is
    -flip a bit on _dedicated_ hardware (crash notifier)
    -launch capture kernel (existing kexec)

    Nothing prevents you from implementing multiple policies to be
    executed/selected among from
    whatever is called by the single pointer function.

    My key point is:
    The complexity in my suggestion is a low as it can get, thus reliability of
    kexec (hopefully) is unaffected
    If crash notifiers is implemented by a complex "management system", I
    might loose
    reliability of kexec because of something I basically do not need.

    Or to put it in other words, I you need to implement anything complex
    for managing your policies,
    you should add it yourself and you yourself is the only one being
    affected by increased complexibility.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-06 12:14    [W:0.022 / U:10.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site