![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 03:17 +0200, Voluspa wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 11:25:03 +0200 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 02:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 15:34:15 +0800 > > > Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > > > > Remove 'fastcall' directive for function readahead_close(). > > > > > > > > It has drawn concerns from Andrew Morton. > > > > > > Well. I think fastcall is ugly and vaguely silly. Now if we has a > > > really_really_fastcall then I'd like to use that! > > > > > > > > > > Now I have some benchmarks > > > > on it, and proved it as a _false_ optimization. > > > > > > Sorry, I don't believe this will be measurable (and with CONFIG_REGPARM > > > it'll be a no-op). > > > > we should just make CONFIG_REGPARM be "it" always (and thus make it go > > away as config option) and then just remove all "fastcall" from the > > kernel... > > Wu, I don't know anything about REGPARM, which my x86_64 config doesn't have, because it doesn't need it since it's default for that architecture - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-05 10:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||