[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans
    Quoting Andrew Morton (
    > proc-sysctl-add-_proc_do_string-helper.patch
    > namespaces-add-nsproxy.patch
    > namespaces-add-nsproxy-dont-include-compileh.patch
    > namespaces-incorporate-fs-namespace-into-nsproxy.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-introduce-temporary-helpers.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-switch-to-using-uts-namespaces.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-switch-to-using-uts-namespaces-alpha-fix.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-switch-to-using-uts-namespaces-cleanup.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-use-init_utsname-when-appropriate.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-use-init_utsname-when-appropriate-cifs-update.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-implement-utsname-namespaces.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-implement-utsname-namespaces-export.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-implement-utsname-namespaces-dont-include-compileh.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-sysctl-hack.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-sysctl-hack-cleanup.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-sysctl-hack-cleanup-2.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-sysctl-hack-cleanup-2-fix.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-remove-system_utsname.patch
    > namespaces-utsname-implement-clone_newuts-flag.patch
    > uts-copy-nsproxy-only-when-needed.patch
    > # needed if git-klibc isn't there:
    > #namespaces-utsname-switch-to-using-uts-namespaces-klibc-bit.patch
    > #namespaces-utsname-use-init_utsname-when-appropriate-klibc-bit.patch
    > #namespaces-utsname-switch-to-using-uts-namespaces-klibc-bit-2.patch
    > utsname virtualisation. This doesn't seem very pointful as a standalone
    > thing. That's a general problem with infrastructural work for a very
    > large new feature.
    > So probably I'll continue to babysit these patches, unless someone can
    > identify a decent reason why mainline needs this work.
    > I don't want to carry an ever-growing stream of OS-virtualisation
    > groundwork patches for ever and ever so if we're going to do this thing...
    > faster, please.

    Eric, Kirill, Dave, Hubertus,

    In the spirit of 'faster, please', does someone care to port and
    resubmit a pidspace patch?

    I'll do it if noone else wants to, just don't want to step on anyone's
    toes if you were already working on it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-05 16:46    [W:0.024 / U:1.456 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site