![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:45:48 +0800 Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote: > Andrew, this small patch makes the radixtree tester program from > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/rtth.tar.gz > run OK, with the latest radix tree code in linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm2. > > It regulates the return value to 0/1 for functions > radix_tree_tag_get() and radix_tree_tagged(). > Well yes. But it slows down the kernel. It would be better to fix rtth. > --- > > --- linux.orig/lib/radix-tree.c > +++ linux/lib/radix-tree.c > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static inline void tag_clear(struct radi > static inline int tag_get(struct radix_tree_node *node, unsigned int tag, > int offset) > { > - return test_bit(offset, node->tags[tag]); > + return !! test_bit(offset, node->tags[tag]); > } test_bit() is (sadly) defined to return 0 or 1. Did this really make a difference? > static inline void root_tag_set(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned int tag) > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline void root_tag_clear_all(st > > static inline int root_tag_get(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned int tag) > { > - return root->gfp_mask & (1 << (tag + __GFP_BITS_SHIFT)); > + return !! (root->gfp_mask & (1 << (tag + __GFP_BITS_SHIFT))); > } > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-04 11:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||