![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 21:32:23 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 01:50:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > areca-raid-linux-scsi-driver.patch> > > I'm going to start sending the Areca driver to James, too. The vendor > > has worked hard and the hardware is becoming more important - let's help > > them get it in.> > > In general, I'm a bit disappointed at the time it takes new drivers to > reach the upstream kernel. I grant that a lot of vendor drivers are > unreadable, unmergable shite... but on the other side of the coin, I > see a lot of decent drivers get stalled simply because they aren't > perfect.> > I would rather see a driver get "95% there" -- because once a driver is > merged into the upstream kernel, it has a lot more visibility, and will > inevitably receive the remaining changes and cleanups anyway. > Yes, I agree. As long as we reasonably think that a piece of code *will* become acceptable within a reasonable amount of time then going early is safe. A large part of that calculation is non-technical: do we believe that the originator will do the work to get things finished off. Often, that's a pretty easy call to make. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-05 03:50 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||