![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 01:50:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > readahead-kconfig-options.patch [...] > It's early days yet - needs heaps more performance testing. The results > from "Linux Portal" <linportal@gmail.com> were discouraging. I found this mail from the lkml archive, did you happen to have more results? ------ Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:22:50 +0200 From: "Linux Portal" <linportal@gmail.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: The adaptive readahead patch benchmark There is an interesting (although simple) benchmark of Wu's adaptive readahead patchset (v12) together with graphs here: http://linux.inet.hr/adaptive_readahead_benchmark.html In that simple test it definitely looks promising (3x speedup). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-05 00:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||