![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat 2006-07-01 03:04:55, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > [klibc/kinit in kernel] > > I'd like to eventually move swsusp out of kernel, and klibc means I > > may be able to do that without affecting users. Being in kinit is good > > enough, because I can actually share single source between kinit > > version and suspend.sf.net version. > > Heh. Take a look at anyone who's using real initramfs for their boot > process. Not initrd, not kernel-without-any-preboot-fs, but real > initramfs. For them, if kinit/klibc will be in kernel, nothing changes, > because their initramfs *replaces* in-kernel code and future supplied- > with-kernel-klibc-based-kinit. So if you'll move swsusp into kinit, > it WILL break setups for those users!.. ;) Distros will probably want to use "real" code from swsusp.sf.net, not stripped down version, provided for back compatibility with kernel. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-07-02 00:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||