[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:37:01AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Couldn't it be possible to have the misrouted irq function mark the
> DISABLED_IRQ handlers as IRQ_PENDING? Then have the enable_irq that
> actually enables the irq to call the handlers with interrupts disabled
> if the IRQ_PENDING is set?

We still have the ambiguity with disable_irq. Really we need to have
disable_irq_handler(irq, handler)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-03 23:56    [W:0.080 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site