![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Jay wrote:
> The ENOBUFS i experienced in my testing would start to happen
> when exit rate at around 14000 exits/sec. While our fields confirmed
> that a 1000 threads exit/sec was a real, i have no reason to be
> concerned of 14000 exits/sec rate. ;)
Andrew wrote:
>1000 exits/sec/CPU can happen. How many CPUs did that machine have?
Jay - what happens if we have 1024 CPUs (the current default config
for ia64/sn2)?
My naive expectation would be that the rate of exits/sec would go up as
the number of CPUs. In other words, I'd expect the exits/sec/CPU to be
a rough constant, slowly increasing over the years as the CPU clock
rate goes up.
So if current CPU technology can generate 1000 exits/sec, and if we
have 1024 CPUs then doesn't that mean we'd like to handle a million
exits/sec?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-29 10:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||