[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Network namespaces a path to mergable code.
Andrey Savochkin <> writes:

> Hi Eric,
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:51:26AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Andrey Savochkin <> writes:
>> > One possible option to resolve this question is to show 2 relatively short
>> > patches just introducing namespaces for sockets in 2 ways: with explicit
>> > function parameters and using implicit current context.
>> > Then people can compare them and vote.
>> > Do you think it's worth the effort?
>> Given that we have two strong opinions in different directions I think it
>> is worth the effort to resolve this.
> Do you have time to extract necessary parts of your old patch?
> Or you aren't afraid of letting me draft an alternative version of socket
> namespaces basing on your code? :)

I'm not terribly afraid. I can always say you did it wrong. :)

I don't think I am going to have time today. But since this conversation
is slowing down and we are to getting into the technical details.
I will try and find some time.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-28 20:18    [W:0.069 / U:5.880 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site