Messages in this thread |  | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | | Subject | Re: Network namespaces a path to mergable code. | | Date | Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:14:41 -0600 |
| |
Andrey Savochkin <saw@swsoft.com> writes:
> Hi Eric, > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:51:26AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Andrey Savochkin <saw@swsoft.com> writes: >> >> > One possible option to resolve this question is to show 2 relatively short >> > patches just introducing namespaces for sockets in 2 ways: with explicit >> > function parameters and using implicit current context. >> > Then people can compare them and vote. >> > Do you think it's worth the effort? >> >> Given that we have two strong opinions in different directions I think it >> is worth the effort to resolve this. > > Do you have time to extract necessary parts of your old patch? > Or you aren't afraid of letting me draft an alternative version of socket > namespaces basing on your code? :)
I'm not terribly afraid. I can always say you did it wrong. :)
I don't think I am going to have time today. But since this conversation is slowing down and we are to getting into the technical details. I will try and find some time.
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |