Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:41:07 +0200 | | From | Lukas Jelinek <> | | Subject | Re: Kernel API Reference Documentation |
| |
>>>>>I looked at >>>>>http://www.kernel-api.org/docs/online/2.6.17/da/dab/structsk__buff.html >>>>> >>>>>and you apparently ignore kernel-doc for structs. Cf. >>>>>include/linux/skbuff.h:177 ff. >>>> >>>>There are several problems. The one you describe is probably caused by a >>>>blank line between the struct and the related comment. Doxygen doesn't >>>>recognize it correctly (and simply ignores the comment). >>> >>>No blank line in this case. >> >>Oh, yes, there is a blank line between the comment and the struct. It's >>a pitty that someone put much effort into writing a usable description, >>which is then not seen. Anyway, should we find all such occurences in >>the kernel tree and fix them, or make a workaround for doxygen? > > > Which struct are we talking about here? I missed it. > > I guess the easy answer is Both. > However, I'm working on fixing up the kernel tree, so sending > patches is correct IMO. >
We are currently talking about struct sk_buff. And there _is_ a single blank line which avoids to make a relation between the struct and the comment above.
Lukas
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |