Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:03:24 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm |
| |
On Tue 2006-06-27 19:22:37, Brad Campbell wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > >>Some of the advantages of suspend2 over swsusp and uswsusp are: > >> > >>- Speed (Asynchronous I/O and readahead for synchronous I/O) > > > >uswsusp should be able to match suspend2's speed. It can do async I/O, > >etc... > > ARGH! > > And the next version of windows will have all the wonderful features that > MacOSX has now so best not upgrade to Mac as you can just wait for the next > version of windows. > > suspend2 has it *now*. It works, it's stable.
uswsusp also has it *now*, in case you missed it. I just do not do benchmark runs all the time, and don't know how fast suspend2 is. uswsusp already uses normal I/O ... and that is asynchronous.
Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |