[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 2/6] [Network namespace] Network device sharing by view
Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,

Hi Andrey,

> It's good that you kicked off network namespace discussion.
> Although I wish you'd Cc'ed someone at OpenVZ so I could notice it earlier :). ?

> When a device presents an skb to the protocol layer, it needs to know to which
> namespace this skb belongs.
> Otherwise you would never get rid of problems with bind: what to do if device
> eth1 is visible in namespace1, namespace2, and root namespace, and each
> namespace has a socket bound to

Exact. But, the idea was to retrieve the namespace from the routes.

IMHO, I think there are roughly 2 network isolation implementation:

- make all network ressources private to the namespace

- keep a "flat" model where network ressources have a new identifier
which is the network namespace pointer. The idea is to move only some
network informations private to the namespace (eg port range, stats, ...)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-26 16:59    [W:0.113 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site