lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 23 Jun 2006 04:06:25 -0700
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: [patch 07/61] lock validator: better lock debugging
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:25:23 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +#define DEBUG_WARN_ON(c)						\
> > > +({									\
> > > +	int __ret = 0;							\
> > > +									\
> > > +	if (unlikely(c)) {						\
> > > +		if (debug_locks_off())					\
> > > +			WARN_ON(1);					\
> > > +		__ret = 1;						\
> > > +	}								\
> > > +	__ret;								\
> > > +})
> > 
> > Either the name of this thing is too generic, or we _make_ it generic, 
> > in which case it's in the wrong header file.
> 
> this op is only intended to be used only by the lock debugging 
> infrastructure. So it should be renamed - but i fail to find a good name 
> for it. (it's used quite frequently within the lock debugging code, at 
> 60+ places) Maybe INTERNAL_WARN_ON()? [that makes it sound special 
> enough.] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() might work too.

Well it has a debug_locks_off() in there, so DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() seems right.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-23 11:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2008