![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:> > > Performance testing is critical here. I think some was done, but I don't > > reall what tests were performed, nor do I remember the results. Without such > > info it's not possible to make a go/no-go decision.> > Tests did show that there was no performance regression for the usual > tests. That is to be expected since the patch should only modify the > behavior of shared writable mapping. The use of those is rare in typical > benchmarks. Of course. In this case one should prepare an artificial microbenchmark so we can understand the worst case. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-22 08:18 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||