lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] stop on cpu lost
    On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:04:31 -0500
    Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com> wrote:

    > Randy.Dunlap wrote:
    > > Sounds like we are getting nowhere. The sysctl knob might
    > > have to be the answer.
    >
    > I don't like having the kernel forcibly kill or stop tasks for this
    > case, regardless of whether the behavior is configurable. What I
    > originally meant to suggest was a sysctl knob which will control
    > whether the offline will fail in this situation.
    Okay, stop_on_cpu_lost patcfh is not good anyway.
    Andrew, could you drop stop_on_cpu_lost patch ?

    From this discussion, it seems there is a direction.
    I'll update my avoid_cpu_removal_if_busy patch and add sysctl for it.

    > But I'm still more inclined to leave the kernel's handling of this as it
    > stands, since this is policy that can be implemented in userspace.
    >
    A program to walk through all tasks and check thier allowd_cpus ?

    > We need to preserve the current behavior as the default, in any case.
    >
    I agree here.

    -Kame

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-22 19:24    [W:0.032 / U:0.804 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site