Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:05:49 +0100 (BST) | Subject | Re: Why can't I set the priority of softirq-hrt? (Re: 2.6.17-rt1) | From | Esben Nielsen <> |
| |
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Esben Nielsen wrote: > >> >>> I have to check, whether the priority is propagated when the softirq is >>> blocked on a lock. If not its a bug and has to be fixed. >> >> I think the simplest solution would be to add >> >> if (p->blocked_on) >> wake_up_process(p); >> >> in __setscheduler(). >> > > Except that wake_up_process calls try_to_wakeup which grabs the runqueue > lock, which unfortunately is already held when __setscheduler is called. >
Yeah, I saw. Move it out in setscheduler() then. I'll try to fix it, but I am not sure I can make a test if it works.
Esben
> -- Steve > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |